Learning First, Technology Second Learn

Learning First, Technology Second
By:Liz Kolb
Published on 2017 by

Learning with technology doesn't happen because a specific tool |revolutionizes| education. It happens when proven teaching strategies intersect with technology tools, and yet it's not uncommon for teachers to use a tool because it's |fun| or because the developer promises it will help students learn. Learning First, Technology Second offers teachers the professional learning they need to move from arbitrary uses of technology in their classrooms to thoughtful ways of adding value to student learning. This book includes: An introduction to the Triple E Framework that helps teachers engage students in time-on-task learning, enhance learning experiences beyond traditional means and extend learning opportunities to bridge classroom learning with students' everyday lives. Effective strategies for using technology to create authentic learning experiences for their students. Case studies to guide appropriate tech integration. A lesson planning template to show teachers how to effectively frame technology choices and apply them in instruction.

This Book was ranked at 29 by Google Books for keyword technology.

Book ID of Learning First, Technology Second's Books is Lp9KnQAACAAJ, Book which was written byLiz Kolbhave ETAG "vIydQpSs/bA"

Book which was published by since 2017 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781564846327 and ISBN 10 Code is 1564846326

Reading Mode in Text Status is false and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have "150 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryEducation

This Book was rated by Raters and have average rate at ""

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is false

Book Preview

Do not you kind of hate how we've joined the decadent stage of Goodreads wherein possibly fifty per cent (or more) of the evaluations written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually naked and unabashed within their variously effective attempts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you type of pine (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the great ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were uniformly plainspoke Do not you sort of hate how we've joined the decadent phase of Goodreads wherein probably fifty % (or more) of the opinions compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually bare and unabashed in their variously powerful attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you sort of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the great ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were consistently plainspoken, only functional, unpretentious, and -- above all otherwise -- dull, dull, boring? Don't you type of loathe when people say'don't you believe this way or feel this way'in an endeavor to goad you both psychologically and grammatically into accepting together? In the words of ABBA: I do, I do, I do(, I actually do, I do). Well, because the interwebs is just a earth where days gone by stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we can review the past in their inviolable presentness anytime we wish. Or at the least till this site finally tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's review of Macbeth in their entirety. I've destined it with a heavy rope and drawn it here for your perusal. (Please recognize that several a sic are intended in these reviews.) its really complex and ridiculous! why cant we be examining like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the very least that book is great! There you have it. Refreshingly, not really a evaluation written in one of many witch's comments or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal yell unleashed in to the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) an adolescent, but I admire his power to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation by having an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's overview of the same play. You may'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'only at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in so it implies that he designs problems... which can be the case, for several I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that that you do not want to read is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it had been designed to be read, then it would be a novel, not really a play. Together with that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for every single character for a few pages). None of us had see the play before. None folks wanted to see it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. All this compounded to make me pretty much hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also really can fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to learn plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play then you have sinned and are likely to hell, if you believe in hell. If not, you're planning to the DMV. I'm also tired of all you could smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a message overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, this indicates offensively egocentric and mean-spirited you may anticipate others tokowtow for your small linguistic rules. Inventive appearance is going to free of charge alone no matter how you try for you to shackle it. That may be the stick, Aubrey. With the viewpoint, a enjoy Macbeth appeared to be this worste peice at any time compiled by Shakespeare, and also this is saying quite a bit considering furthermore, i examine the Romeo plus Juliet. Ontop of it is really by now astounding plan, improbable characters in addition to absolutly discusting list of morals, Shakespeare publicly molds Sweetheart Macbeth as the correct vilian inside the play. Considering she actually is mearly the particular style within the spine round in addition to Macbeth him or her self is usually truely choosing a horrible violations, such as murder and fraud, I really don't realise why it is so quick to imagine in which Macbeth could be prepared to try and do good as an alternative to unpleasant but only if their partner had been far more possitive. I do believe that it have fun with is definitely uterally unrealistic. Nonetheless the subsequent is in no way the particular ne plus extra associated with typical publication reviewing. Though succinct in addition to with no unproductive desire to help coyness and also cuteness, Jo's evaluation alludes to your animosity therefore serious it is inexpressible. Just one imagines a handful of Signet Classic Editions broken into in order to parts along with pruning shears within Jo's vicinity. I don't really like this particular play. Because of this that I can not actually ensure that you get any kind of analogies or similes in respect of the amount I personally despise it. The incrementally snarkier sort probably have explained anything like...'I hate this specific engage in like a simile I won't surface with.' Not Jo. Your lover talks any natural, undecorated truth of the matter unsuitable regarding figurative language. Along with there's certainly no problem with that. Once within a fantastic even though, when you are getting neck-deep with dandified pomo hijinks, it is a pleasant wallow inside hog coop that you are itchin'for. Many thanks, Jo. Everyone loves you and your ineffective clasping with similes this are unable to technique your bilious hate with your heart. That you are my very own, in addition to We're yours. Figuratively conversing, with course. And from now on here's the examine: Macbeth by way of William Shakespeare is best literary deliver the results while in the English language words, in addition to anybody who disagrees is usually an asshole including a dumbhead.