Technology, E-learning and Distance Education
By:Tony Bates
Published on 2005 by Psychology Press
Award-winning in its first edition, this book is an essential guide to the use of technology in flexible and distance learning, weighing up the pros and cons of different media. Fully updated, this second edition: examines criteria and guidelines for the design and delivery of effective teaching, using modern learning technologies focuses on the use of the Internet for distance and flexible education considers the design and use of emerging technologies such as web-based video-conferencing and speech recognition places emphasis on organisational and management issues and how these influence the effective use of technology gives attention to the integration of online teaching with campus-based face-to-face teaching. With a focus on basic principles and general guidelines this guidance applies to existing and emerging technologies. It is essential reading not just for those specialising in flexible and distance learning and distance education, but anyone concerned with the integration of technology with teaching.
This Book was ranked at 9 by Google Books for keyword technology.
Book ID of Technology, E-learning and Distance Education's Books is yOpH1aOuopcC, Book which was written byTony Bateshave ETAG "ml8yj77FQNA"
Book which was published by Psychology Press since 2005 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9780415284363 and ISBN 10 Code is 0415284368
Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false
Book which have "246 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryEducation
This Book was rated by Raters and have average rate at ""
This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE
Book was written in en
eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is trueand in ePub is true
Book Preview
Do not you type of hate how we've entered the decadent stage of Goodreads where perhaps fifty % (or more) of the opinions compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now bare and unabashed within their variously powerful attempts at being arc, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you sort of pine (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the great ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were uniformly plainspoke Do not you sort of hate how we've entered the decadent period of Goodreads where perhaps fifty percent (or more) of the reviews published by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now actually nude and unabashed in their variously powerful efforts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you type of maple (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were evenly plainspoken, simply practical, unpretentious, and -- above all otherwise -- dull, dull, boring? Do not you kind of loathe when people claim'do not you believe in this way or sense that way'in an attempt to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically into agreeing with them? In the words of ABBA: I actually do, I actually do, I do(, I do, I do). Properly, as the interwebs is really a world where yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the present (and with fetish porn), we are able to review yesteryear in its inviolable presentness anytime we wish. Or at least until this site eventually tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's overview of Macbeth in their entirety. I have bound it with much string and pulled it here for your perusal. (Please understand that several a sic are intended in the next reviews.) their actually difficult and stupid! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the very least that guide is good! There you have it. Refreshingly, not really a review written in one of the witch's sounds or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Merely a primal yell unleashed into the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) an adolescent, but I admire his ability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation having an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's overview of the exact same play. You might'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies he designs problems... which might be the case, for many I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you never want to see is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it had been designed to be read, then it would be a novel, not really a play. On top of that the teach had us students read the play aloud (on person for every character for a couple pages). None of us had see the play before. None folks wanted to see it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared as if they weren't paying attention. This compounded to create me more or less hate reading classics for something like 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. Plus it can definitely fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the writer and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to learn plays is wrong, and if you require anyone, under duress, to see a play then you have sinned and are likely to hell, in the event that you rely on hell. If not, you're likely to the DMV. I'm also fed up with all you could smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists along with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of an email overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, this indicates offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to expect others tokowtow to the small linguistic rules. Creative manifestation may absolutely free alone it doesn't matter how you attempt in order to shackle it. That is your current stick, Aubrey. Within my very own impression, your enjoy Macbeth seemed to be the particular worste peice previously provided by Shakespeare, this is saying a great deal taking into consideration in addition, i study his or her Romeo in addition to Juliet. Ontop regarding it's presently incredible piece, unlikely figures and absolutly discusting pair of morals, Shakespeare openly portrays Girl Macbeth as the legitimate vilian from the play. Taking into consideration she's mearly the particular express inside the back spherical and Macbeth herself is definitely truely choosing the hideous offences, like hard along with scams, I would not realise why it is so simple to visualize this Macbeth would certainly be prepared to try and do beneficial rather than wicked but only if their wife were more possitive. I really believe that this engage in is usually uterally unrealistic. But this is undoubtedly the actual ne additionally especially with traditional e book reviewing. Although succinct as well as without the annoying desire to coyness or maybe cuteness, Jo's critique alludes to some animosity therefore profound that it's inexpressible. Just one imagines a number of Signet Classic Editions broken into to help portions with pruning shears around Jo's vicinity. I dispise the following play. So much in fact of which I can't actually supply you with almost any analogies as well as similes with regards to the amount My partner and i not like it. A good incrementally snarkier type might have reported something like...'I dislike the following participate in such as a simile I can't show up with.' Never Jo. Your lover speaks a new uncooked, undecorated truth unsuitable with regard to figurative language. And there is nothing wrong using that. As soon as throughout a great though, when you are getting neck-deep within dandified pomo hijinks, it is a good wallow inside hog compose you will be itchin'for. Thanks a lot, Jo. Everyone loves you and the useless gripping from similes which are unable to technique the bilious hatred inside your heart. You might be my own, along with We're yours. Figuratively conversing, of course. And already here i will discuss my personal review: Macbeth by William Shakespeare is best fictional operate in the Uk dialect, and also anybody who disagrees can be an asshole and also a dumbhead.
Comments
Post a Comment